
|
 |

Fight Club
(1999)
Reviewed by Scott Marshall
Rating: 7 Beans
ell. After sitting through FIGHT CLUB and letting it sink in for a little while, I think I’m ready to talk about it. But before I do so, I should warn the reader not to continue if you haven’t seen the movie. This review will contain a lot of plot details which you wouldn’t want to know in advance. You also shouldn’t read this review if you haven’t seen THE SIXTH SENSE. Really.
Still here? OK. I’ll assume that you’ve seen the film from here on in.
I hardly know where to begin. David Fincher is a director who is clearly interested in challenging and disturbing the audience, as evidenced in his previous work (ALIEN3, THE GAME, and especially SE7EN). He is also clearly interested in blurring the border between the audience as external viewer and as a participant; this is especially pronounced in FIGHT CLUB, which is told to the audience by Edward Norton with occasional breaches of the fourth wall (talking directly to the audience). It’s a movie which demands close attention.
Norton is a man who is depressed. He feels empty despite the fact that he has a decent income, nice possessions and other trappings of modern consumer life. He becomes addicted to support groups because they allow him an outlet for emotion, even if it is falsely generated emotion. When he meets Helena Bonham Carter, another "tourist," he can no longer enjoy the support groups. He tells himself it is because she distracts him by her presence- a reminder of his own pretending, perhaps- but he is obviously attracted to her and perhaps he hates the fact that he feels a deep seated need for a real relationship.
How fortuitous, then, that he should meet Brad Pitt on a plane coming home from a business trip. Pitt is a soap maker and barroom prophet, expounding on the artificiality of society and its general emasculation. When Norton’s condominium apartment unexpectedly explodes and destroys all of his material wealth, he calls Pitt to ask for a place to stay. No problem, says Pitt; but first do me a favour and hit me as hard as you can.
So begins a macho rediscovery (if not initial discovery) of our animal roots. In a controlled environment, Fight Club members can experience the joy of beating the crap out of each other. I can attest that there is something to it: I used to kickbox a little and there are certainly mental and physical benefits to that kind of exercise, especially for someone who is depressed. The exercise, improved self-esteem and renewed sense of commitment to something can be a powerful addiction.
Pitt and Norton’s spartan lifestyle and legendary private brawling attract some like-minded, aimless guys who are looking for someone to follow. The club grows and new chapters open in the surrounding areas. Enthusiastic about the power this gives him, Pitt seems to become more and more unhinged as time goes on, eventually training an army of fight club members to commit acts of vandalism in the name of disrupting normal society. He also lays the blocks to Bonham Carter on a regular basis, a sexual aggressor who is far from Norton’s impotent self.
Dismayed by the dangerous turn which the club’s activities are taking, Norton tries to reason with Pitt and is rewarded with a chemical burn, among other things. When a fellow club member is shot and killed by police in a botched mission, Norton and Pitt part ways philosophically. Pitt has a larger plan in the works which will destroy many buildings in many cities, erasing bank records of personal credit and bringing America into a new era of independence from the rat race.
Oh, and yeah: Norton and Pitt have been the same person all along. Like the role that made his name, Norton seems to have multiple personality disorder. Possibly the worst case ever.
I’m amazed that I didn’t guess it earlier, since I did guess Bruce Willis’ twist in THE SIXTH SENSE, and since there were a number of clues which I could have put together beforehand; but it was a genuine surprise, and not an entirely welcome one. The story which started as plausible had evolved into social commentary and was suddenly taking a sharp turn into cloud cuckoo land. I guess Fincher deserves points for keeping it a secret, because it does definitely have an impact. Unfortunately it’s all kind of downhill from there as Norton tries to get Pitt out of his mind and takes drastic measures to do so.
So, as a pure cinematic experience, FIGHT CLUB has its moments; but I don’t see movies simply for their style. If the director plans to challenge me with the story too, so much the better. Challenge is good. What’s not good about this movie is that for all of its anarchist posturing, it cannot look at itself in the mirror as sincere commentary or satire. It wants to be both but does not succeed in either.
On the commentary front, Pitt’s message is attractive to aimless young white men (and others) like myself. He says that we were "raised by women" and have no great war or depression to define us. He says that our pursuit of consumer happiness is killing our spirit and we need to get back to basics. Fair enough. But one could also argue that if you asked our fathers and grandfathers, they would say that they like their easy chairs and TVs just fine, thank you very much. They busted their balls working like dogs to put your smart ass through college, they dodged bullets overseas and fought to ensure that easy life you have now. If their dreams for their children translated into a sense of entitlement that’s impossible to achieve, that’s a shame; but we’re the adults now. If you don’t like your life, change it or shut up.
Anyway. By the time Pitt was building his army and planning regimented missions to disrupt the order of things, I started to see the film as a satire. Norton had switched one safe, mindless life for another. Clever indeed. So why couldn’t I just suspend my disbelief and settle in while Brad’s freedom fighters toppled the tyranny of credit cards?
Because suddenly it was a film about class. We wash your cars, serve your food and protect you while you sleep, Pitt tells the chief of police. Don’t fuck with us. Pitt’s crypto-fascist blue collar militia very conveniently includes every plumber and security guard in the buildings that he plans to blow up- huge high rises will apparently be completely empty when the explosions detonate. Give me a break. Terrorism is OK, then, as long as nobody gets physically hurt? The economic impact of destroying the bank credit system could very well create a new Great Depression and then these morons would have their day in the sun?
There is nothing more frustrating in movies than one which advances a million questions but is too timid to venture an answer- doubly frustrating in this case because the script can blame everything on insanity and solve that dilemma with more pointless violence.
Here’s my answer: you don’t need Brad Pitt’s permission to change your life. If you don’t like the way things are going, get off your ass, turn off the TV, turn off the computer, and update your resumé so you can start looking for a better job. We here in North America enjoy the best standard of living in the world, if not the universe. Our consumption of natural resources and our dominance of the world economy- inflating stocks in worthless internet companies, for example- is screwing the rest of the world. Most of us can’t manage to have a meaningful relationship with another person (or raise the children which result), and yet we expect to seize the reins of power because we can do a better job? Get real.
Empowerment is not the knowledge that you can kick the crap out of another guy, or forcing your agenda on others by political or economic means. It is the ability to think for yourself and pursue your life as an active participant rather than a passive onlooker. At least Norton seemed to realize that in the end; too bad this schizoid movie never gets its act together.
Other reviews for this movie:
Ned Daigle
"Bad Movie Night" is a presentation of
Hit-n-Run Productions, © 1997-2006,
a subsidiary of Syphon Interactive, LLC.
Site created and managed by Ken and Scoot
|